The last time I wrote about The Donald, I defended his success in the US Elections in 2016. Some friends voiced their disappointment in my stance, yet others (childishly) unfriended and blocked my profiles on Social Media. I don’t know what it is, but when everyone else goes left, I will unassumingly go right! Maybe it’s that silent rebel in me, or that uncontrollable urge to piss people off!
Anyway, my analysis was partly based
on his promises and commitments to the American people and his stance on
America’s foreign policy in the Middle East and elsewhere. Though it probably has always been a risk
trusting politicians with their promises during campaign trails, I threw my hat
in with the Donald due to my distrust of a Presidency of one Hilary Rodham
Clinton. This scepticism was based purely on her history of sowing chaos in the Middle East (Libya, Yemen) and Eastern Europe (Ukraine). I firmly believed
that Hilary Clinton would have been the cause of the next global war between nuclear
armed countries. I firmly believed that this woman was crazy enough to instigate
such a global catastrophe. If you have seen the video of her interview commenting on the destruction of Libya and the death of Muhammar Gadhafi, you would
understand what I’m talking about.
With a reflection on the list of failures in his career, and his family’s alleged affiliation with the far right,
The Donald’s success in the White House was always going to be questionable and
controversial. His success at the polls was
the last thing that was expected from liberal America and prior to the
elections Hilary Clinton’s rise to the White House was a forgone conclusion by
every media pundit trolling the mainstream media; Little did they know that
rural America was going to have none of it, and was sick of the cyclical
bullshit every US President had brought to their Society since the first Clinton enjoyed fellatio in the White House. They were sick of the endless wars their government was
sowing around the world. They wanted real change locally. They wanted someone
who would provide some hope of rebuilding their country, and not send their
fathers, sons, brothers, and partners to remote areas of the globe to fight
wars which had very little bearing or influence on the prosperity of their
society. On the contrary, these wars fueled more hatred for the US government,
from almost every other nation in the world, especially in the Middle East. In
Donald Trump, they had a flicker of hope; not much, but it was a better choice
than ordering more of the same in Hilary Clinton. They knew that in Clinton,
nothing would change, but things would probably get worse. Her political
scandals did little to convince the American public that she was the real deal.
Thus, the electorate decided that they would choose the lesser of two evils, in
Donald Trump.
Donald Trump’s first 100 days in
the White House was not convincing, and there was little evidence of commitment to his campaign promises. He flip flopped on various issues and occasionally
did or said the exact opposite of what he promised. He changed staff in his
team the way American Football players are substituted. He would say one thing
today, and a few days later would totally reverse and take a different stance.
After the first one hundred days, it was starting to look like The Donald was totally out of
his depth and it seemed like he didn't have a clue.
One of the things Trump promised
on his campaign trail, was that he was going to “drain the swamp” when he got to the White House. He implied that he was going to purge
his administration of the undesirable factions whose agenda was not consistent with the policies of the US Government or in the interests of the American Public. On his
arrival in Washington, he realized that this draining the swamp would be more
challenging than hanging someone from a tree in the Deep South. He realized that running the US Administration was not the same as running an Academy of MBA hopefuls. But, he was
consistent in his “You’re fired”
mantra when someone did not supposedly conform, as was witnessed in his chopping
and changing staff almost weekly in those one hundred days.
In politics around the globe there
will always be groups or organisations, be they profitable or non- profitable, contesting
for a slice of a sitting government’s influence to further their own interests.
In American politics this type of external influence in government policy is no
exception. Depending on the extent to
which this interest is sought, it can hugely affect the strategic goals of that
Administration. The bigger the influence, the more a sitting Government may
surrender their mandate in exchange for political favours or self-interests. This
phenomenon has come to be known as a “Shadow State” or “Deep State”. There are various examples around the world
where this “takeover” of a sitting government is evident. A prime example of this would be none other
than in my own country, the South African Government.
This “Deep State” is what Trump
was referring to when he committed to “draining the swamp” in Washington. On taking up the Presidency, only then did he
realise the extent to which this Deep State had influenced the US
Administration. Needless to say, this
external influence on the US Government dates back to the George Bush Snr and
Bill Clinton Administrations. These influences were especially prominent in the
many State Security agencies, like the FBI, CIA, and some fifteen other
agencies. Yes, there are 17 official State Intelligence agencies in the United
States. Therefore, this changed the simple task of “draining the swamp” into a mammoth Macro Project of desalinating
the Atlantic, instead. When Trump showed signs that he wanted to deliver on
some of his campaign trail commitments, e.g. improve relations with Russia, he was
accused of colluding with the Russians to influence the elections in his
favour. When he tried to de-escalate the
US presence in Syria, more allegations of bribery and corruption were leveled
against him. He subsequently had no choice but to play ball with his
adversaries in his Administration, or risk the possibility of
impeachment through nefarious motives and unsubstantiated allegations.
Since Hilary Clinton was the
preferred candidate to push the agenda of the Deep State, yet lost the election,
it put much more pressure on The Donald to conform to their needs or face the
consequences. Hence, his unpopularity
from the day he beat Hilary at the polls. His battle with this party of rogues
is far from over, and they will not rest until he is totally in their court, or
he is impeached. Their goal was always to have a pliable individual in the
White House to further their agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment